Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671593›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Does occupational noise exposure aggravate age-related hearing loss? A population-based study.

Dongha Kim, Sungwon Park, Jingyeong Jeong, Jaesung Park, Jae-Jun Song, Sung-Won Chae

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dongha KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungwon ParkKorea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jingyeong JeongKorea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaesung ParkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Jun SongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Won ChaeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. koreachae@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6401-352X

Funding

Korea University K2509241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether occupational noise exposure aggravates the progression of age-related hearing loss and to analyze frequency-specific annual threshold shifts.

methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from 3,719 participants (aged ≥ 40 years) in the 9th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES, 2023). Occupational noise exposure was defined as working in an environment with loud noise for ≥ 3 years. Linear regression with an interaction term (age × noise exposure) was used to compare the annual rate of threshold deterioration (dB/year) for each frequency.

resultsThe noise-exposed group (n = 617) showed worse hearing thresholds than the unexposed group (n = 3,102) across all ages. Across frequencies, the largest absolute threshold difference between groups was observed at 4 kHz (10.0 dB, p < .001). Among frequencies, 2, 4 and 8 kHz were significantly associated with noise exposure after adjusting for age, sex, educational level and household income, with 4 kHz being the most prominent (OR per 1 dB increase, 1.020; 95% CI, 1.014-1.025). Age-related hearing decline was steeper in the noise-exposed group than in the unexposed group (excess shift of 0.10 dB/year, p = .008). In frequency-specific analysis, the noise-exposed group showed the largest excess annual hearing decline at 2 kHz (0.17 dB/year, p < .001) and 4 kHz (0.17 dB/year, p = .005), followed by 1 kHz (0.09 dB/year, p = .034).

conclusionsOccupational noise exposure was associated with a poorer hearing and a steeper age-related widening of the threshold gap versus unexposed individuals, most prominently at 2 and 4 kHz. These findings underscore the need for clinicians and hearing conservation programs to focus on 2 and 4 kHz thresholds when monitoring noise-exposed workers.

Indexed as

Hearing loss, noise-inducedHearing loss, sensorineuralPopulation characteristicsPopulation healthPresbycusis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.