ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Towards point-of-care diagnostics of neglected tropical diseases using nucleic acid amplification tests.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) impose a substantial global burden, yet diagnostic innovation for these conditions has historically been lower than for other major infectious diseases. Addressing this diagnostic gap is a prerequisite for their elimination, as recognised by the World Health Organization (WHO). This critical review evaluates the current scope of point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests (POC NAATs) through a systematic analysis of 39 studies. This is achieved via a breakdown of the nucleic acid amplification workflow and associated implementation barriers with a focus on operational feasibility rather than analytical metrics such as sensitivity and specificity. The reviewed publications showed several reoccurring themes such as simplified extraction methods, integrated workflows on platforms or devices, smartphone apps for interpretation, reducing cold-chain dependence, and electricity-independent workflows. However, several technical, analytical, and implementation barriers were also identified which hinder the transition from proof-of-concept prototypes to field-deployable tools that meet the criteria set up by the WHO for POC tests. The review showcases that a majority of current NAAT developments for NTDs do not yet fulfil the WHO criteria for POC application in resource-limited settings. Whilst there are opportunities for improvement as well as for repurposing NAAT platforms for other diseases, careful examination of all steps from sample collection to mature implementation in the field is required to achieve the aim set up by the WHO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.