ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Machine learning for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: Comparison with the T.O.HO. score.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urolithiasis remains a significant clinical burden, and accurately predicting stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is essential for optimizing patient counseling and surgical planning. This study compared the predictive performance of a machine learning-based Random Forest (RF) model with the T.O.HO. scoring system, a traditional prediction tool designed for flexible ureteroscopy. A total of 452 patients who underwent RIRS for renal or proximal ureteral calculi at a single tertiary center were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative demographic and radiological variables were collected, and postoperative stone-free status was assessed at the third week using KUB radiography or non-contrast CT when clinically indicated. The T.O.HO. score was calculated for each patient. The RF model was trained on 70% of the dataset and tested on the remaining 30%, using only preoperative variables, with model optimization performed within the training set using 5-fold cross-validation, and predictive performance evaluated through accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The T.O.HO. score showed limited but statistically significant discrimination in this cohort. Higher T.O.HO. values were associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative stone-free status, indicating an inverse relationship between the score and surgical success. When interpreted accordingly for stone-free status prediction, the T.O.HO. score yielded an AUC of 0.615 (95% CI 0.556-0.674). In contrast, the RF model showed higher apparent internally validated discrimination, achieving an AUC of 0.843, an accuracy of 87.5%, a sensitivity of 98.1%, and a specificity of 53.1%. Feature importance analysis indicated that stone thickness, preoperative nephrostomy, stone length, stone width, and age contributed most significantly to the model's predictive ability. Overall, these findings suggest that a machine learning-based approach may provide complementary individualized risk stratification for postoperative stone-free status after RIRS when used alongside established clinical judgment and existing scoring systems. However, this model was developed and evaluated using internal validation only, and external prospective validation is required before its clinical implementation can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.