SynthesisApplied health economics and health policy2026
Job Stress, Burnout and Healthcare Utilization: Evidence from a Systematic Literature Review and Implications for Future Research.
Synthesis in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJob stress has become an increasing public health concern worldwide, affecting a substantial proportion of the workforce and contributing to significant morbidity. Although extensive evidence has documented its adverse health effects, much less is known about how occupational stress translates into healthcare utilization, which is essential for assessing its economic burden on healthcare systems and informing public policy.
objectiveTo our knowledge, this study provides the first systematic review of empirical evidence linking job stress and burnout to healthcare utilization.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, 533 articles published between January 1990 and February 2026 were identified in MEDLINE, Web of Science and SciELO databases and screened. After applying the eligibility criteria, based on peer-reviewed articles published in English or Spanish examining healthcare utilization among employed individuals exposed to job stress or burnout, 18 studies were included, highlighting the limited empirical evidence currently available.
resultsAll studies were conducted in high-income countries; 72% used cross-sectional designs, and job stress was most frequently measured using Karasek's demand-control model (56%). The findings suggest a consistent positive association between occupational stress and healthcare utilization, particularly medication use. Sixteen studies examined medication use, most reporting statistically significant associations with increased consumption of psychotropic drugs. In contrast, only two studies analyzed other forms of healthcare utilization, such as inpatient care or primary care consultations.
conclusionOverall, the evidence suggests that adverse psychosocial working conditions may contribute to increased demand for healthcare resources, although important gaps remain regarding the broader healthcare consequences. This study proposes a research agenda to better assess and quantify its healthcare burden. Understanding this relationship is essential for designing workplace policies aimed at reducing occupational stress and improving the efficiency and sustainability of healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.