Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671504›Full record

ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2026

Cell-retention for lipid production in continuous Schizochytrium limacinum SR21 cultures fed with dark fermentation effluent.

Simon Täuber, Leonie Ackermann, Henry Schittkowski, Peter Neubauer, Stefan Junne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon TäuberBioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstraße 76 ACK24, 13355, Berlin, Germany.
Leonie AckermannBioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstraße 76 ACK24, 13355, Berlin, Germany.
Henry SchittkowskiBioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstraße 76 ACK24, 13355, Berlin, Germany.
Peter NeubauerBioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstraße 76 ACK24, 13355, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan JunneBioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstraße 76 ACK24, 13355, Berlin, Germany. sju@bio.aau.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6185-2627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marine protist Schizochytrium limacinum SR21 is a promising producer of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from short-chain carboxylic acids (SCCAs). Dark fermentation effluent (DFE) is an SCCA- and nutrient-rich substrate derived from biogenic residues and has previously been evaluated for microbial lipid production. However, its low carbon concentration limits volumetric productivity and causes substantial culture dilution when larger feed volumes are required. Membrane-based cell retention is an established process intensification strategy for low-concentration feed solutions, as it decouples hydraulic residence time from biomass residence time. However, the combination of DFE utilisation and cell retention for DHA production by S. limacinum has received little attention. In this study, repeated fed-batch and cell retention strategies were evaluated to overcome dilution limitations and enable intensified biomass and lipid production from DFE. Additional cultivations with defined SCCA mixtures showed preferential uptake of acetate and butyrate over propionate and lactate, which was also observed during DFE conversion. In repeated fed-batch operation, biomass output reached 7.5 g after 95 h. In contrast, a final biomass output of 33 g was achieved in cell retention mode, representing a 4.4-fold increase. This improvement was not associated with enhanced substrate conversion efficiency but resulted from retaining biomass while increasing DFE throughput. While applying cell retention, the specific palmitic acid concentration increased to 116 mg g⁻¹, while DHA remained comparatively stable at 57 mg g⁻¹. This resulted in a DHA titre of 1.9 g L⁻¹ compared with 0.24 g L⁻¹ in repeated fed-batch. Nitrogen and phosphate removal reached 58% and 87%, respectively. However, the relatively high nutrient content of DFE limited the establishment of strong nitrogen limitation. Overall, cell retention enabled process intensification with a total lipid space-time yield of 0.07 g

Indexed as

Aurantiochytrium limacinumDocosahexaenoic acidMembrane bioreactorMicrobial hydrolysisPolyunsaturated fatty acidsVolatile fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID42671504
PMCPMC13529634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.