ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
The Woodpecker variable-speed drilling protocol for robot-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement: technique and a consecutive series of 1027 screws.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Published descriptions of robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement remain limited, particularly for subaxial screws and for workflows integrating positioning, registration, and drilling. Small pedicle diameter, steep trajectories, and proximity to the vertebral artery magnify the consequences of minor technical error. This retrospective single-center case series included 117 consecutive patients undergoing robot-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement between November 2023 and June 2026. One workflow was applied across open, hybrid and percutaneous approaches, comprising rigid Mayfield fixation, thoracic and pelvic fixation to the table, table-mounted robotic guidance without patient-mounted pins, O-arm planning, and a standardized variable-speed drilling protocol. Screw position was graded on postoperative O-arm imaging using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Drilling was commenced at 1029 pedicles. Two trajectories were abandoned after bleeding raised suspicion of vertebral artery injury, and no screw was placed at either. Of 1027 placed screws, 1015 (98.8%) were Grade A or B and 12 (1.17%) Grade C, with no Grade D or E breach and no breach of the lateral pedicle wall. Mean blood loss was 288.8 mL, with no motor evoked potential loss. Both patients with suspected vascular injury remained free of clinical sequelae beyond 18 months. Robot-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement can be performed safely within a workflow that stabilizes the patient-table construct and standardizes drilling through the pedicle. Screw containment and procedural safety are distinct measures. The Woodpecker technique is one component of this workflow rather than a stand-alone intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.