ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Population-based ultrasound reference values for inter-rectus distance: threshold prevalence, percentiles, and the limitations of fixed cutoffs.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis population-based study aimed to characterize the distribution of inter-rectus distance (IRD) and its upper range in adult women using standardized multisite ultrasound measurements and a percentile-based interpretive framework.
methodsData was driven from the Finnish Women's Health Study (WENDY, 2020-2023), comprising women assigned female at birth with a mean age of 35 years (age range 33-37 years, SD 0,6). Women less than six months postpartum, exclusively breastfeeding, or with prior midline abdominal surgery or hernia repair involving a midline incision or abdominoplasty were excluded. Inter-recti distance was measured at six predefined locations along the linea alba in the supine, knee-flexed resting position using ultrasound. For the analysis, the maximal IRD of each examinee across all sites was used.
resultsA total of 1,840 women with naturally occurring anatomy were examined. At the standard site 3 cm above the umbilicus, the mean IRD was 2.37 cm (SD 1.19 cm; range 0.35-9.86 cm). Nulliparous women had a lower mean IRD (1.52 cm, SD 0.70 cm; 0.35-4.37 cm, n = 539) than parous women (2.71 cm, SD 1.18 cm; 0.46-9.86 cm, n = 1,301). The cohort's 80th percentile for IRD was 3.24 cm. Based on maximal IRD, 38.5% had IRD ≥ 3 cm and 5.4% exceeded 5 cm; the 95th percentile was 5.09 cm. Maximal IRD most often occurred at the level of the umbilicus (41.3%) or 3 cm above (44.1%) and rarely below the umbilicus. Maximal IRD correlated weakly with adiposity measures (body mass index (BMI) ρ = 0.227; waist ρ = 0.273; weight ρ = 0.199) and no correlation was observed with height. Regression analysis showed that each childbirth was associated with a 0.42 cm increase in maximal IRD, and BMI increased IRD by 0.061 cm per kg/m².
conclusionIRD is a continuous anatomical characteristic exhibiting considerable normal variation among adult women. A maximal IRD of up to 5 cm may be regarded as being within the upper tail of the population reference distribution. Fixed cutoff values should be proportionate to clinical symptoms, in order to prevent unnecessary interventions. Altogether, our findings provide population-based reference data for interpreting IRD measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.