ArticleBalkan medical journal2026
A Habitat Imaging-Based Radiomics and Deep Learning Fusion for Preoperative Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Balkan medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a critical prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer; however, reliable preoperative prediction remains challenging because of the lack of non-invasive and accurate assessment tools. Ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning have shown promise, but conventional single-modality approaches often fail to capture intratumoral heterogeneity, thereby limiting their predictive performance and clinical interpretability. Aims: To develop and validate a non-invasive ultrasound-based model that integrates habitat radiomic features with deep learning features for the preoperative prediction of LVI in invasive breast cancer and to evaluate whether this model could enhance the diagnostic performance of radiologists. Study Design: Retrospective multicenter diagnostic study. Methods: A total of 1,096 patients from three institutions were included. Tumors on routine B-mode ultrasound were partitioned into three habitats using unsupervised k-means clustering (k = 3). Habitat2, identified as a high-risk subregion associated with LVI, was used for selective radiomic feature extraction. In parallel, deep learning features from all habitat subregions were extracted using a pretrained ResNet50 model. Radiomic and deep learning features were fused at the feature level, and a LightGBM classifier was trained and evaluated in an internal validation cohort and two independent external cohorts. Model performance was compared with that of the Habitat2 radiomics-only and ResNet50-only models using the DeLong test and with the performance of unaided senior and junior radiologists. Biological interpretability was assessed through correlation analysis with CD31-stained microvessel density. Results: The fusion model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.918 (training), 0.898 (internal validation), 0.890 (External Cohort 1), and 0.905 (External Cohort 2), significantly outperforming the Habitat2 radiomics-only and ResNet50-only models (DeLong test: fusion vs. Habitat2 radiomics, all Conclusion: This interpretable habitat-deep learning fusion approach based on routine ultrasound provides accurate preoperative LVI prediction with robust generalizability across multiple centers and suggests the potential to enhance clinical decision-making by improving radiologist diagnostic performance, particularly for less-experienced radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.