Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671131›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Subspace reverse-correlation estimation of receptive fields during free viewing.

S Amin Moosavi, Elaine Tring, Dario L Ringach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S Amin MoosaviDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elaine TringDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dario L RingachDepartment of Neurobiology and Department of Psychology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Thalamic constraints on cortical organizationR01EY034488 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2025
$1.8M
Population codes and sensory discriminationRF1NS116471 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
Population codes and sensory discriminationR01NS116471 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2024
$789k
Cortical adaptation in neural populationsR21EY035064 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2024 to 2025
$424k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034488NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035064NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116471NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS116471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately mapping receptive fields under naturalistic viewing requires correcting for distortions introduced by eye movements. Current approaches often rely on parameterized "shifter networks" optimized with Poisson generalized linear models, but these methods are computationally intensive and limited to small regions of interest. We present a new framework that exploits the translation properties of Hartley basis functions to model eye position effects directly as phase shifts, eliminating the need for explicit retinal image reconstruction. This formulation admits closed-form gradients, enabling efficient parameter optimization and rapid convergence. Validation on simulated data shows that the method accurately recovers both ground-truth receptive fields and the underlying image transformation. Applied to high-density mouse V1 recordings, the approach substantially improves receptive field sharpness compared to naive estimates. While the method is specific to Hartley basis stimuli, once calibrated, it provides a reusable mapping between eye position and retinal translation. This efficiency and scalability make the technique a practical tool for receptive field mapping in free-viewing experiments and for integration with optical imaging and large-scale electrophysiology. We discuss the relative advantages, limitations, and applicability of the method in comparison with existing convolutional neural network/shifter-network approaches.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsModels, NeurologicalRetinaVisual CortexVisual FieldsAnimalsMicePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42671131
PMCPMC13533300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.