ArticleJournal of vision2026
Subspace reverse-correlation estimation of receptive fields during free viewing.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the visual cortex with Zebra noise and wavelets.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately mapping receptive fields under naturalistic viewing requires correcting for distortions introduced by eye movements. Current approaches often rely on parameterized "shifter networks" optimized with Poisson generalized linear models, but these methods are computationally intensive and limited to small regions of interest. We present a new framework that exploits the translation properties of Hartley basis functions to model eye position effects directly as phase shifts, eliminating the need for explicit retinal image reconstruction. This formulation admits closed-form gradients, enabling efficient parameter optimization and rapid convergence. Validation on simulated data shows that the method accurately recovers both ground-truth receptive fields and the underlying image transformation. Applied to high-density mouse V1 recordings, the approach substantially improves receptive field sharpness compared to naive estimates. While the method is specific to Hartley basis stimuli, once calibrated, it provides a reusable mapping between eye position and retinal translation. This efficiency and scalability make the technique a practical tool for receptive field mapping in free-viewing experiments and for integration with optical imaging and large-scale electrophysiology. We discuss the relative advantages, limitations, and applicability of the method in comparison with existing convolutional neural network/shifter-network approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.