ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Utility of ultrasound biomicroscopy in detecting invasive ocular surface squamous neoplasia.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the role of preoperative ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in diagnosing invasive ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN).
methodsThis retrospective single institution-based study included surgical cases of OSSN, in which UBM was performed preoperatively. The UBM characteristics of OSSN and signs of invasion were studied. The preoperative UBM imaging findings were correlated with the postoperative histopathological examination (HPE). The performance of UBM was studied in predicting invasive OSSN, considering HPE as the gold standard.
resultsFifteen patients were included in the study, with an average age of 61 ± 12.8 years and an 80% male preponderance (n = 12). A clear plane between the lesion and the sclera was considered as episcleral or 'non-invasive,' and disruption of this interface was interpreted as 'invasive OSSN.' Compared to postoperative HPE, UBM interpretation predicted invasive OSSN with an accuracy of 73.3%, a sensitivity of 71.4%, and 100% specificity.
conclusionsUBM is a useful adjunctive tool for assessing the invasion, lesion height, and depth of invasion in OSSN. On correlating with HPE, UBM showed a good performance in preoperative detection of invasive OSSN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.