Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671011›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Gene expression is stable despite widespread cis and trans regulatory divergence in Saccharomyces yeasts.

Danithza S Rojas, Gregory I Lang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danithza S RojasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem PA, USA  18015.ORCID 0009-0007-5834-3013
Gregory I LangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem PA, USA  18015.ORCID 0000-0002-7931-0428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory evolution can alter phenotypes, but cis- and trans-regulatory mechanisms may also diverge extensively while total transcript abundance remains stable. Comparisons of parental expression with allele-specific expression in F1 hybrids provide a framework for separating cis- and trans-regulatory effects because both parental alleles are measured in a shared trans-regulatory environment. Here, we analyzed RNA sequencing data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces paradoxus, and their F1 hybrid. Among the 4,164 genes with sufficient allele-specific support for strict classification, 2,134 (51.2%) showed detectable cis and/or trans regulatory divergence. However, hybrid expression remained largely conserved, with 81.5% of genes not significantly different from either parent. Compensatory cis-trans divergence predominated over reinforcing divergence; cross-replicate estimation reduced the apparent magnitude of this excess, but opposite-sign effects remained predominant in all 20 non-overlapping replicate comparisons. To connect gene expression to genome sequence, we analyzed the strongly cis-diverged locus LYS2 and found species differences in promoter architecture, including an S. cerevisiae-specific AT-rich insertion, altered spacing among candidate regulatory features, and a promoter-proximal TATA-like element unique to S. cerevisiae. Sequence-based nucleosome prediction suggests that these differences create a broader promoter-proximal nucleosome-depleted region in S. cerevisiae than in S. paradoxus. We also quantified allele-resolved intron retention and found that allele-resolved intron retention was broadly conserved, with only rare locus-specific hybrid-associated shifts. Together, these results show that regulatory divergence is widespread but often buffered in the hybrid, whereas intron-retention divergence is comparatively limited.

Indexed as

cis regulationGene expressionSaccharomycessplicingtrans regulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.