ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2026
Operationalising storage-discharge balance to enhance pluvial flood resilience: modelling and planning strategies in flat and sloping urban areas.
Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Storage and discharge are two fundamental solutions to strengthening pluvial flood resilience. Recent studies reveal that many urban catchments operate under a persistent storage-discharge imbalance, driven by urban densification. This 'imbalance' raises concerns in hydrologic, economic, spatial, and social aspects. This research aims to quantify the balanced relationship between storage capacity and discharge capacity (storage discharge balance, SDB) for pluvial flood protection and provide planning strategies for different urban topographies. We suggest and apply a quantification method using different modelling tools, hydrological and hydrodynamic models, in two cases with distinct physical and socioeconomic characteristics: one in a flat polder area in Nanjing, China, and the other in a sloping hilly area in Feldbach, Austria. By comparing these cases, insights are gained into the modelling methods, results, and proposed strategies for each context. The use of the SDB chart mapping framework supports the identification of both short- and long-term targets, as well as dynamic pathways toward enhanced flood resilience. These insights will facilitate multidisciplinary dialogue on key constraining factors, thereby enabling the co-creation of an actionable solution. While the quantitative findings are context-dependent, the novel approach can be applied to other cities to facilitate their resilience planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42670990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.