ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026
Temporal Inflammatory Profile in Skin Surface after Oronasal Mask Application.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin damage from routine oronasal facemask use is common, but the early molecular changes and timing of inflammatory cytokine responses remain poorly characterized due to limitations in conventional detection methods. Early pressure ulcer formation involves a critical window where physiological changes occur before visible signs. This study addresses this gap, aiming to monitor the temporal inflammatory profile in skin sebumsurface after the standard use of oronasal facemasks. Sebum samples were collected from 11 patients at six6 timepoints up to 180 min post-mask removal. A panel of 71 inflammatory proteins was analysed using multivariate statistics, protein network analysis, and mathematical modelling. Two distinct cytokine response phases were identified: an early phase (0-20 min) and a delayed phase (40-180 min), with 17 cytokines driving this separation. Notably, the delayed phase showed sustained elevation despite the absence of visible erythema, indicating ongoing subclinical inflammation. Network analysis revealed activation of pathways related to angiogenesis, cell death regulation, and tissue remodelling - hallmarks of early wound healing and microvascular stress. These findings enhance understanding of early pressure ulcer pathophysiology, identify optimal biomarker sampling windows, and support the development of point-of-care biosensors for early detection and prevention of pressure-induced skin damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.