ArticleInorganic chemistry2026
Magnetic, EPR, and Computational Insights into ∼D6h Tb(III) and Gd(III) Complexes.
Article in Inorganic chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lanthanide complexes continue to gain significant interest in molecular quantum science due to their rich electronic structures, which can be engineered to support protected spin states relevant for quantum technologies. Carefully tailored ligand fields can give rise to avoided level crossings between crystal-field perturbed states, which may reduce sensitivity to magnetic field fluctuations. Motivated by this, we investigate an axially compressed pseudo-D6h symmetry air-stable macrocyclic Tb(III) complex [TbIII(LN6)(Ph3SiO)2]+ using ab initio calculations, magnetic and EPR measurements. The axially compressed, pseudo-D6h symmetry imposes a ground state that is predominantly composed of mJ = ±6 for the oblate J = 6 Tb(III) ion, with small admixtures from lower |mJ⟩ components. We investigate the hexagonal vs nonhexagonal transverse crystal field contributions to the tunneling gap, calculating different models by selecting from the ab initio crystal field parameters. Our calculations predict a small tunneling gap, ≈1 GHz, and we test this prediction experimentally using multifrequency EPR on La(III)-diluted powder samples. Our EPR results are consistent with the possibility of a low-energy (several GHz) tunneling gap. The Gd(III) analog [GdIII(LN6)(Ph3SiO)2]+ provides an orbital-quenched comparison, and its magnetic data and EPR spectra are well described using the axial zero-field splitting parameter D, demonstrating experimentally the largely axial ligand field in this pseudo-D6h environment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.