ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Harmonizing Peak Matching between Multidimensional NMR Spectra.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common task in the analysis of multidimensional NMR spectroscopy is the mapping of cross-peaks from one spectrum to another. In some situations, only a subset of coordinates of cross-peaks are to be matched, such as in comparing corresponding dimensions of triple resonance assignment spectra. In other cases, the sample is perturbed in some way, and the task is to map corresponding cross-peaks that potentially change in all dimensions. This exercise is commonly done "by hand" and is both time-consuming and subjective. It is difficult for an individual to consider all possible interpretations of deviations between two multidimensional NMR spectra. Furthermore, in regions of high degeneracy, cross-peak matchings between spectra can be ambiguous. Ideally, a mapping algorithm should reflect confidence in its matchings to indicate the reliability of proposed matchings and should do so while harmonizing all potential mappings in the spectrum. Critically, this process should be automated using criteria that are both well-defined and consistent and provide a measure of reliability. Here, we develop a novel model describing the distribution of apparent deviations between cross-peaks of two multidimensional NMR spectra due to random noise and true deviations to harmonize the cross-peak matching. Bayesian inference is employed to provide confidence estimates. The resulting algorithm (pHarmony) is tested in a variety of ways such as mapping between pairs of triple resonance spectra and between two- and three-dimensional heteronuclear NMR spectra generated by a fragment-based ligand discovery screen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.