ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Bend and Snap: Computationally Exploring the Helix Bias for Classifying Abl Kinase Allosteric Modulators.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allosteric modulation of Abl kinase via its myristoyl binding pocket is a promising strategy for drug discovery, either aiming at inhibition to treat Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, or activation, under investigation for breast cancer therapy. Although activators and inhibitors can be differentiated by the induced α-helix-I conformation, in silico classification has been proven challenging. Our study distinguishes these classes effectively by integrating multiple computational approaches that account for the conformational plasticity of the regulatory α-helix-I. By evaluating traditional molecular docking, co-folding, and molecular dynamics simulations with methodology benchmarking, we use these methods to uncover mechanistic principles of allosteric modulation. Docking highlighted potentially stabilizing C-F interactions with deep-pocket residues, while co-folding correctly predicted helix bending for inhibitors and outperformed docking in virtual screening. Molecular dynamics revealed that the α-helix-I samples multiple possible conformations and uncovered motions consistent with dynamic coupling between helix bending and long-range restraint of the activation loop, a nuanced mechanism that static models could not elucidate. This study provides a validated framework that combines efficient classification with mechanistic analysis by combining molecular docking, co-folding, and molecular dynamics. Our approach aids in identifying myristoyl pocket ligands, differentiating inhibitors from activators, and suggesting allosteric principles that govern their function, paving the way for more rational design of next-generation, function-specific Abl modulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.