ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Gaps in AI-Driven Pharmacokinetic Property Prediction for Early Drug Development: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning applications in preclinical drug development have been focused on automated covariate selection in pharmacometric modeling and high-throughput screening processes early in drug discovery. While inherent drug property prediction has made significant improvements in the past decade, fusing early target-based drug discovery methods to preclinical stage pharmacokinetic (PK) property predictions has been limited. This scoping review investigates the current state of PK property prediction of small molecules in drug discovery using machine learning methods and a combination of machine learning and mechanistic models. We identified major obstacles hindering the development of superior prediction models for small molecule behavior in biological systems. These encompass data accessibility, quantity, and quality, architectural constraints such as poor interpretability and model inherent assumptions, and the lack of robust evaluation and uncertainty assessment methods. To mitigate data-related constraints, we advocate for the use of collaborative federated learning frameworks. Furthermore, we propose leveraging the pattern recognition capabilities of deep learning models in conjunction with the biological interpretability provided by mechanistic approaches to strike an optimal balance between accuracy and biological explainability guided by the intended application of the prediction model. Addressing these limitations will advance reliable modeling pipelines and enable effective extrapolation to novel chemical space, additional species, and emerging drug development scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.