ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
From Ternary Modeling to Predictive PROTAC Design: A Computational Perspective.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are heterobifunctional small molecules that induce targeted protein degradation by recruiting an E3 ligase to a protein of interest. Since 2019, publication volume has accelerated, and computational methods have expanded from isolated demonstrations into practical tools for modeling PROTAC-induced ternary complexes, designing linkers, and forecasting degradation-related outcomes. Here, we present a Perspective on computational PROTAC methodologies published from 2019 to the present, organizing the field into two complementary streams: (i) constraint-driven, physics-based workflows that assemble and refine ternary complex models by enforcing geometric feasibility and evaluating pose stability using docking and molecular simulation; and (ii) data-driven workflows, including deep learning predictors and generative models that predict ternary complex structure, degradation end points, or linker chemistry from structural and assay data. We highlight representative approaches spanning restrained/tethered docking, MD-based refinement and dynamic stability scoring, coarse-grained free-energy modeling, SE(3)/E(3)-equivariant structure prediction, supervised degradation efficacy prediction, and generative linker design. We close by emphasizing persistent gaps, fragmented benchmarking, score robustness across targets and E3 ligases, and nonstandard molecular representations that currently limit generalization and reproducible, pipeline-ready deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.