Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42670835›Full record

ReviewActa orthopaedica2026

An Acta Orthopaedica educational article: Current strategies for meniscal preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Håvard Visnes, Eivind Inderhaug

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Håvard VisnesThe Norwegian Knee Ligament Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Orthopaedics, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand; Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway. havard.visnes@gmail.com.
Eivind InderhaugThe Norwegian Knee Ligament Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Sports Traumatology and Arthroscopy Research Group, University of Bergen, Bergen; Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meniscal preservation is a cornerstone of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), reflecting the meniscus' critical role in joint homeostasis and long-term knee health. Concomitant meniscal injuries are common and increasingly managed with repair rather than resection. This educational review summarizes current strategies for the most frequent acute meniscal tears encountered during ACLR. Contemporary practice favors repair whenever feasible, supported by evidence linking meniscal preservation to improved outcomes and reduced osteoarthritis risk. Lateral meniscus posterior root tears are commonly managed with transtibial or anchor-based repair. Ramp lesions require systematic inspection and selective repair, with both all-inside and suture-based techniques yielding favorable results. Bucket-handle tears are repaired using all-inside, inside-out, or combined approaches depending on tear location, with high survival rates when performed alongside ACLR. Radial tears, particularly in vascular zones, should be repaired to restore hoop stress, although optimal suture configurations remain debated. Successful outcomes rely on mechanically stable repairs, individualized rehabilitation, knee stability and alignment, and a supportive biological environment.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionKnee InjuriesMenisci, TibialTibial Meniscus InjuriesHumansSuture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID42670835
PMCPMC13527611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.