Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42670833›Full record

Observational studyActa orthopaedica2026

Patients' choice of healthcare provider for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a national register-based observational cohort study of 62,676 patients from Norway, 2014-2018.

Beate Hauglann, Cato Kjærvik, Eva Stensland, Yohannes Tesfay, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Tor Ingebrigtsen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beate HauglannCentre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE), Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Tromsø, Norway.
Cato KjærvikCentre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE), Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Tromsø; Department of Surgery, Nordland Hospital Trust, Vesteraalen Hospital, Stokmarknes; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. beate.hauglann@helse-nord.no.ORCID 0000-0003-0556-334X
Eva StenslandCentre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE), Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Tromsø; Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Yohannes TesfayCentre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE), Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Tromsø, Norway.
Anne Marie FenstadThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6429-0153
Ove FurnesThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8223-2515
Tor IngebrigtsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø; Department of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5966-9786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWe aimed to quantify how provider-related factors are associated with patients' revealed, GP-mediated choice of arthroplasty provider in Norway, expressed as willingness to travel (WTT) in minutes, and to explore how WTT for travel time was modified by patient characteristics.

methodsThis is a national observational cohort study including all publicly funded, elective primary hip and knee arthroplasties in Norway, 2014-2018 (n = 62,676), with linkage to national registries. A mixed logit model was used to analyze choice among providers with different attributes, in both preference and WTT space. Associations between individual-level travel-time preferences and patient characteristics were analyzed with multilevel modelling.

resultsPatients accepted substantial additional travel time for several provider attributes. Mean WTT was 156 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 130-182; median 8) for a dedicated elective surgical unit, 70 min (CI 67-72) for a provider within the patient's regional health authority, 16 min (CI 15-17) for above-median surgical volume, 4 min (CI 3-5) for an adult child living near the provider, and 3 min (CI 3-3) for below-median waiting time. WTT for travel time was reduced in patients with high comorbidity (-27%), low education (-33%), and low income (-30%), with graded gradients across categories, and decreased with increasing age.

conclusionProvider attributes were associated with patients' revealed, GP-mediated choice of arthroplasty provider, expressed as clinically interpretable WTT. WTT was lower among older, sicker, and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, indicating that realized choice is patterned by both modifiable structural features of the healthcare system and patient-level socioeconomic gradients.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChoice BehaviorPatient PreferenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayRegistriesTime FactorsTravel

Identifiers

PMID42670833
PMCPMC13527609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.