Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42670535›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026

Identification and Comparative Evaluation of Analgesic Components in Toad Venom on Inflammatory Pain.

Yuting Wen, Ruixiang Li, Xialian Cui, Fang Zhang, Jiange Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuting Wen *Innovation Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine (IRI), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
Ruixiang Li *Innovation Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine (IRI), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-0496
Xialian CuiInnovation Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine (IRI), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
Fang ZhangInnovation Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine (IRI), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
Jiange ZhangInnovation Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine (IRI), Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although toad venom has been utilized in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries to manage pain, a systematic evaluation of its material basis against inflammatory pain remains lacking. This study sought to rigorously assess the analgesic efficacy of toad venom extracts and their active constituents, identify the principal bioactive components, and explore their potential underlying mechanisms through the integration of network pharmacology and experimental observation, thereby providing a scientific foundation for its potential therapeutic application. Materials and Methods: Activity-guided fractionation and LC-Q-TOF-MS were employed to identify the key active compounds of toad venom. Analgesic activities of the extracts, fractions, and selected monomers were evaluated using a carrageenan-induced mouse pain model. Network pharmacology was utilized to predict potential therapeutic targets. The predicted mechanisms were subsequently validated in vitro using lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages and in vivo across distinct murine inflammatory models. Finally, a preliminary toxicological evaluation was conducted to assess in vivo safety. Results: Ethyl acetate and methanol fractions were identified as the primary active extracts. Subsequent screening revealed that Cinobufagin and Resibufogenin exhibited the most prominent analgesic properties among the tested monomers. Focusing on an examined subset of the network pharmacology predictions, in vitro assays indicated that both compounds effectively downregulated the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB signaling axis. Notably, Resibufogenin demonstrated superior anti-inflammatory efficacy and significantly mitigated oxidative stress by restoring cellular antioxidant defenses (GSH and TEAC). In vivo evaluations further showed that Resibufogenin robustly attenuated carrageenan-induced paw edema, xylene-induced ear swelling, and LPS-induced systemic inflammation. Furthermore, therapeutic dosages of Resibufogenin (3 and 10 mg/kg) exhibited no detectable toxicity under the tested conditions without inducing observable pathological lesions in major organs. Conclusion: Through origin screening, bioassay-guided fractionation, and LC-Q-TOF-MS analysis, Cinobufagin and Resibufogenin were identified as the principal analgesic constituents of toad venom. Integrated bioinformatic and experimental analyses suggest that their efficacy is associated with anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Notably, Resibufogenin, exhibiting no detectable toxicity under the tested conditions and alleviated inflammatory pain, which may involve the suppression of the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB cascade and alleviating oxidative stress, highlighting its potential as a promising lead compound for novel analgesic therapeutics.

Indexed as

cinobufagininflammatory painresibufogenintoad venom

Identifiers

PMID42670535
PMCPMC13526397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.