ArticleCureus2026
Assessment of Sleep Quality and Related Factors Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Among the General Population in Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdequate, high-quality sleep is essential for maintaining physical, mental, and emotional health. However, sleep disturbances are increasingly reported among young adults globally. Examining the social, economic, and behavioral determinants of poor sleep is essential to inform targeted public health interventions. This study aimed to assess sleep quality, specific sleep disturbances, and the factors predicting poor sleep patterns among the general population in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia, using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted among 343 adult residents (aged ≥ 18 years) in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via an electronically distributed, validated Arabic version of the PSQI questionnaire, which captured sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors, and seven distinct domains of sleep. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: A total of 343 participants were included in the study. More than half of the participants (58.6%) demonstrated poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5). Sleep latency, disturbance, and daytime dysfunction were the most affected domains. Poor sleep quality was significantly linked to younger age (p = 0.023), student status (p = 0.001), lower income (p = 0.002), and stimulant use (p = 0.006). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that individuals aged >25 years were significantly less likely to report poor sleep (AOR = 0.525; 95% CI: 0.307-0.898; p = 0.019). In contrast, unemployment was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of poor sleep (AOR = 3.271; 95% CI: 1.504-7.114; p = 0.003). Earning 5,000 SAR or more per month lowered the risk (AOR = 0.447; 95% CI: 0.272-0.733; p = 0.001), and using stimulants more than doubled the risk of poor sleep (AOR = 2.272; 95% CI: 1.203-4.181; p = 0.011). Gender, body mass index (BMI), marital status, and chronic disease were not significantly associated with sleep quality (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Poor sleep quality is common among young adults in Saudi Arabia and is linked to age, employment status, income, and stimulant use. These results indicate the necessity of addressing modifiable behaviors, particularly caffeine consumption, and emphasize the importance of implementing targeted sleep health interventions for younger individuals and those experiencing economic hardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.