ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Extracellular Vesicle Therapies for Diabetic Skin Lesions: Mechanisms, Engineering, and Clinical Translation.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers and other chronic diabetic skin lesions persist because vascular insufficiency, neuropathy, infection, oxidative stress, dysregulated inflammation, and impaired stromal and epithelial repair act concurrently. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosome-enriched preparations, can deliver proteins, lipids, and regulatory RNAs to multiple wound-resident cell types and therefore offer a cell-free strategy for this multifactorial pathology. This review examines recent evidence for EV-based therapy across inflammatory resolution, angiogenesis, fibroblast and keratinocyte recovery, extracellular matrix remodeling, redox and mitochondrial homeostasis, and protection from ferroptosis and neutrophil extracellular trap-associated injury. It also evaluates source selection, cargo and surface engineering, and local delivery systems such as hydrogels, dressings, and microneedles. Preclinical studies consistently report improved wound closure and tissue repair, whereas human evidence remains limited to early clinical and biomarker studies. Translation is constrained by product heterogeneity, donor and culture effects, isolation-dependent composition, inconsistent dose metrics, uncertain potency assays, storage and scale-up requirements, and incomplete regulatory alignment. Progress will require phenotype-matched products, MISEV-aligned characterization, GMP-compatible manufacturing, mechanism-linked release assays, and trials that test EVs as adjuncts to high-quality standard care using durable closure and recurrence as clinically meaningful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.