ArticleJournal of CO(2) utilization2026
CO
Article in Journal of CO(2) utilization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rising industrial CO₂ emissions and the limited capacity of current abatement technologies highlight the need for scalable carbon utilization pathways. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis provides a route to convert captured CO₂ into hydrocarbon feedstocks compatible with existing petrochemical processes, such as steam cracking. However, their suitability as steam cracker feedstocks has not yet been fully demonstrated. Three Fischer-Tropsch (FT)-derived feedstocks were generated from captured CO₂ via Reverse Water-Gas Shift followed by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The crude FT oil (i) was hydrotreated to produce hydrotreated FT oil (ii), and subsequent distillation yielded a hydrotreated FT naphtha (iii). The feedstocks were characterized using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography, benchmarked against fossil naphtha in a bench-scale steam cracker, and evaluated for their impact on the carbon intensity of ethylene production. FT-derived feedstocks were highly paraffinic and contained negligible sulfur, nitrogen, halogens, and metals. Crude FT oil contained 11.7 wt% oxygenates and 11.3 wt% olefins, which were removed by hydrotreatment, yielding more stable steam cracker feedstocks. When steam-cracking the respective oils at 880 °C, the crude FT oil produced 38% more ethylene than fossil naphtha, while the yield of pyrolysis fuel oil (C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.