Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42670355›Full record

ArticleJournal of CO(2) utilization2026

CO

Anas Jamil Abdulrahman, Niko Heikkinen, Miia Nevander, Miloš Auersvald, Sphurti Prakash Kulkarni, Oleksii Mynko, Behzad Parvizi, Daniël Withoeck, Marco Huotari, Juha Lehtonen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of CO(2) utilization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anas Jamil AbdulrahmanLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.
Niko HeikkinenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Miia NevanderVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Miloš AuersvaldLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.
Sphurti Prakash KulkarniLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.
Oleksii MynkoLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.
Behzad ParviziLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.
Daniël WithoeckLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.
Marco HuotariVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Juha LehtonenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Christian FrilundVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Matti ReinikainenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Eveliina MäkeläVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, 02044 VTT, Finland.
Marvin KusenbergLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.
Kevin M Van GeemLaboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Ghent University, Zwijnaarde, B-9052, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rising industrial CO₂ emissions and the limited capacity of current abatement technologies highlight the need for scalable carbon utilization pathways. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis provides a route to convert captured CO₂ into hydrocarbon feedstocks compatible with existing petrochemical processes, such as steam cracking. However, their suitability as steam cracker feedstocks has not yet been fully demonstrated. Three Fischer-Tropsch (FT)-derived feedstocks were generated from captured CO₂ via Reverse Water-Gas Shift followed by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The crude FT oil (i) was hydrotreated to produce hydrotreated FT oil (ii), and subsequent distillation yielded a hydrotreated FT naphtha (iii). The feedstocks were characterized using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography, benchmarked against fossil naphtha in a bench-scale steam cracker, and evaluated for their impact on the carbon intensity of ethylene production. FT-derived feedstocks were highly paraffinic and contained negligible sulfur, nitrogen, halogens, and metals. Crude FT oil contained 11.7 wt% oxygenates and 11.3 wt% olefins, which were removed by hydrotreatment, yielding more stable steam cracker feedstocks. When steam-cracking the respective oils at 880 °C, the crude FT oil produced 38% more ethylene than fossil naphtha, while the yield of pyrolysis fuel oil (C

Indexed as

Carbon capture and utilizationCO₂-derived feedstocksEthylene carbon intensityFischer-Tropsch synthesisReverse Water-Gas ShiftSteam cracking

Identifiers

PMID42670355
PMCPMC13525925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.