ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Giant and atypical eccrine tumors of the eyelid: A clinicopathologic analysis.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse the clinicopathological features, diagnostic pitfalls, and unusual presentations of eyelid eccrine tumors. Methods: Retrospective case series of 25 histopathologically confirmed eyelid eccrine tumors surgically excised between 2016 and 2023. Clinical records, histopathology (H&E with selective PAS staining), and follow-up data were reviewed. Results: Eccrine hidrocystoma was the most common subtype (80%, n=20), followed by eccrine hidradenoma (16%, n=4) and eccrine spiradenoma (4%, n=1). Mean patient age was 43.8 years, with a 4:1 male predominance. Clinical misdiagnosis occurred in 84% of lesions, most commonly as sebaceous cysts (64%). cases demonstrated unusual features, including three giant hidrocystomas (>2 cm), one giant hidradenoma (3.0 cm) with ulceration and mechanical ptosis clinically suspicious for squamous cell carcinoma, and one spiradenoma with maggot infestation mimicking malignancy. All giant tumors required excision with reconstruction (e.g., staged Cutler-Beard procedure). No recurrences were observed during follow-up (mean 14 months; range 6-24 months). Conclusion: Eyelid eccrine tumors present a broad clinical spectrum, from small cysts to large masses mimicking malignancy. Giant lesions, though rare, cause diagnostic confusion and functional impairment. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis, and heightened clinical awareness is essential to avoid misdiagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.