ArticleCancer science2026
Adding Intratumoral Antibody-Photoabsorber Conjugate Improves Efficacy of Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT).
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is a new type of cancer treatment that specifically kills target cells while sparing normal tissue. This treatment induces cancer cell death by activating a photoreactive dye with near-infrared light in an antibody-photoabsorber conjugate (APC) bound to the cognate target antigen on the tumor cell surface. NIR-PIT has already been clinically applied in Japan to head and neck cancer patients using an anti-EGFR antibody-IR700 dye conjugate, with very promising results. Furthermore, preclinical studies have shown favorable results across many targets and cancer types. To date, APC administration in NIR-PIT has been performed via intravenous injection. However, some systemic administrations cause side effects. Therefore, local intratumoral injections might be a viable alternative in some cases. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of NIR-PIT following intratumoral administration of APC (IT-PIT) compared with NIR-PIT following intravenous administration of APC (IV-PIT) in various animal models and targets. Intratumoral administration of APC resulted in significantly greater distribution in the target tumor and less in non-tumor organs, showing that the APC can be efficiently delivered to tumor cells by intratumoral administration. In immunodeficient mice, IT-PIT showed similar efficacy to IV-PIT, despite a reduced dose of APC. In immunocompetent mice, IT-PIT showed a significant effect and extended survival, demonstrating the activation of antitumor immunity, comparable to that of IV-PIT. These results indicate that IT-PIT and IV-PIT are similarly effective in both direct cell killing and in inducing anticancer immune activation, suggesting that intratumoral administration of APC might be a promising new approach in NIR-PIT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.