ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
Data-Driven SuStaIn Model of Disability Progression in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether ordinal Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) applied to routine ALSFRS-R item scores can identify reproducible disability progression patterns in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and provide clinically meaningful staging.
methodsWe analysed baseline ALSFRS-R item responses from 866 PRO-ACT participants. Ordinal SuStaIn inferred subtype-specific sequences of functional deterioration and assigned each participant to a subtype and a SuStaIn-derived functional stage. Longitudinal stability was assessed across 3625 consecutive follow-up visit pairs from 697 participants. Structural reproducibility was evaluated in an independent cohort of 301 consecutive ALS patients. Associations of baseline subtype and stage with survival and subsequent ALSFRS-R decline were examined using Cox and piecewise-linear models.
resultsA three-subtype solution identified fine motor-, gross motor- and bulbar-predominant patterns of early disability. Within each subtype, SuStaIn reconstructed ordered multidomain sequences of functional deterioration and assigned each participant a SuStaIn-derived stage. Subtype assignment was stable across 90.4% of consecutive visit pairs, and stage was non-decreasing in 98.8%. Subtype-specific event ordering was reproduced in the validation cohort. Higher baseline stage was associated with increased mortality risk in the fine motor- and gross motor-predominant subtypes, but not clearly in the bulbar-predominant subtype. Baseline stage showed subtype-dependent, non-linear associations with subsequent functional decline, with acceleration up to mid-stage breakpoints in the fine motor- and gross motor-predominant subtypes and less evident stage-dependent acceleration in the bulbar-predominant subtype.
interpretationRoutine ALSFRS-R item-level data can define clinically interpretable ALS progression subtypes and latent SuStaIn-derived functional stages. Joint subtype-stage modelling may refine prognostic stratification and support prognosis-informed trial enrichment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.