ArticleCroatian medical journal2026
Mapping patient complaints to the World Health Organization patient safety rights charter: a retrospective study from Croatia.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate patient complaints submitted to the Split-Dalmatia County Committee for the Protection of Patients' Rights, classify them according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Patient Safety Rights Charter, and evaluate the impact of public awareness interventions on reporting patterns.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 36 written patient complaints submitted from 2022 to 2024. Complaints were independently coded by two reviewers according to the ten categories of the WHO Charter. Public interventions to enhance awareness and accessibility of reporting channels included poster campaigns, media coverage, and community discussions in 2023-2024. Statistical analyses assessed temporal trends, distribution of violations, and provider categories associated with reported breaches.
resultsFrom 36 complaints, we identified 60 WHO Charter violations, most frequently concerning the right to timely, effective, and appropriate care (38%), dignity, privacy, and non-discrimination (22%), and access to medical records (12%). Two-thirds of reported incidents involved primary care providers, while one-third involved hospital-based providers. Reporting significantly increased following visibility campaigns: charter violations increased from 11 (2022) to 36 (2024), with monthly reporting rates tripling compared with the baseline (rate ratio 3.3; 95% confidence interval 1.7-6.4; P?=?0.001). The range of reported rights also broadened, encompassing all ten Charter categories by 2024.
conclusionThis is the first study in Croatia to evaluate systematically coded, committee-reviewed complaints according to the WHO Patient Safety Rights Charter. Our findings suggest that transparent complaint systems and sustained public education are crucial for empowering patients, strengthening accountability, and enhancing patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42669912PMC13552774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.