Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42669881›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2026

Germinal Center Selection and Plasma Cell Differentiation.

Adrien Sprumont, Oliver Bannard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrien SprumontMedical Research Council (MRC) Translational Immune Discovery Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oliver BannardMedical Research Council (MRC) Translational Immune Discovery Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-0564

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UKRI1929Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 315850/Z/24/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germinal centers (GCs) are specialized microenvironments in which B cells undergo affinity maturation through iterative cycles of somatic hypermutation, proliferation and selection, generating antibodies with improved antigen-binding properties. Although GC B cells do not themselves secrete antibody, they differentiate into memory B cells and plasma cells that provide long-term humoral immunity. GC selection has traditionally been viewed as a process that preferentially expands B cells expressing the highest-affinity B cell receptors. However, recent studies have revealed that physiological GC responses preserve substantial clonal and affinity diversity, and generate plasma cells spanning a broad range of antibody affinities. Here, we review current understanding of the mechanisms governing GC B cell selection and discuss an alternative framework in which T cell help quantitatively refuels GC B cells rather than acting as a binary gate for cyclic re-entry. We further explore how antigen organization, antibody feedback and the biophysical context of antigen recognition may reconcile the apparent discrepancy between affinity-based selection and the maintenance of clonal diversity. Finally, we consider how these concepts may alter our expectations for the plasma cell populations emerging from GCs and discuss their implications for rational vaccine design.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationGerminal CenterPlasma CellsAnimalsAntibody AffinityClonal Selection, Antigen-MediatedHumansImmunity, HumoralLymphocyte Activation

Identifiers

PMID42669881
PMCPMC13527179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.