ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Cognitive assessment in heart failure: clinical value, timing, and practical tools.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review examines the clinical value of cognitive assessment in heart failure, highlighting optimal timing, practical tools, and the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications of cognitive impairment. The relationship between heart failure (HF) and cognitive impairment (CI) increasingly represents a growing challenge at the intersection of the heart and brain. Current hypotheses suggest a bidirectional relationship driven by multifactorial mechanisms, including chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, blood-brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation, while shared proteinopathy remains a preliminary and unconfirmed hypothesis. Although CI affects approximately 41% of patients with HF, it remains frequently underdiagnosed in routine practice. The neurocognitive phenotype in HF is characterised predominantly by deficits in executive function, attention, and memory, which critically undermine patient self-management and medication adherence. We critically evaluate available screening modalities, highlighting the limitations of tools like the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in detecting executive dysfunction. This review emphasises screening cognitive impairment in stable heart failure and atrial fibrillation as early as possible with appropriate screening tools in order to be referred to CDAMS or memory clinics for prompt management. Rather than identifying a single superior tool, this review emphasises that the overarching clinical priority is the routine application of multidomain cognitive assessments sensitive to these specific deficits. The review concludes that integrating routine cognitive assessment into HF management is essential for accurate risk stratification, individualised therapeutic planning, and ultimately reducing the neurocognitive burden in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42669736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.