ArticleNature communications2026
Accurate, transferable, and verifiable machine-learned interatomic potentials for layered materials.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Twisted layered van der Waals materials often exhibit unique electronic and optical properties absent in their non-twisted counterparts. Unfortunately, predicting such properties is hindered by the difficulty in determining the atomic structure in materials displaying large moiré domains. Here, we introduce a split machine-learned interatomic potential (MLIP) and dataset curation approach that separates intralayer and interlayer interactions and significantly improves model accuracy, yielding roughly a tenfold improvement in energy and force predictions relative to conventional models. We further demonstrate that traditional MLIP validation metrics - force and energy errors - are inadequate for moiré structures and develop a holistic, physically-motivated metric based on the distribution of stacking configurations. This metric effectively compares the entirety of large-scale moiré domains between two structures instead of relying on conventional measures evaluated on smaller commensurate cells. Finally, we establish that one-dimensional, rather than two-dimensional, moiré structures can serve as efficient surrogate systems for validating MLIPs, permitting validation protocols against explicit DFT calculations. Applying our framework to HfS
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.