Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42669684›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Accurate, transferable, and verifiable machine-learned interatomic potentials for layered materials.

Johnathan D Georgaras, Akash Ramdas, Chung Hsuan Shan, Elena Halsted, Berwyn Berwyn, Tianshu Li, Felipe H da Jornada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johnathan D Georgaras *Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2548-6636
Akash Ramdas *Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4735-7069
Chung Hsuan ShanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Elena HalstedDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Berwyn BerwynDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tianshu LiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Felipe H da JornadaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jornada@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-7151

Funding

NSF | Directorate for Mathematical & Physical Sciences | Division of Materials Research (DMR) DMR-2238328United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research (ONR) N00014-23-1-2567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twisted layered van der Waals materials often exhibit unique electronic and optical properties absent in their non-twisted counterparts. Unfortunately, predicting such properties is hindered by the difficulty in determining the atomic structure in materials displaying large moiré domains. Here, we introduce a split machine-learned interatomic potential (MLIP) and dataset curation approach that separates intralayer and interlayer interactions and significantly improves model accuracy, yielding roughly a tenfold improvement in energy and force predictions relative to conventional models. We further demonstrate that traditional MLIP validation metrics - force and energy errors - are inadequate for moiré structures and develop a holistic, physically-motivated metric based on the distribution of stacking configurations. This metric effectively compares the entirety of large-scale moiré domains between two structures instead of relying on conventional measures evaluated on smaller commensurate cells. Finally, we establish that one-dimensional, rather than two-dimensional, moiré structures can serve as efficient surrogate systems for validating MLIPs, permitting validation protocols against explicit DFT calculations. Applying our framework to HfS

Identifiers

PMID42669684
PMCPMC13526791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.