ArticleNature communications2026
A machine learning framework for predicting and modulating condition-dependent protein phase separation.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomolecular coacervation-mediated materials: Phase states, phase transitions, and biomedical applications.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- A machine learning framework for predicting and modulating condition-dependent protein phase separation.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein phase separation is a fundamental process in organizing membraneless organelles and is implicated in pathological conditions. Importantly, this process is dynamic and depends on conditions such as concentration, temperature, and solvent composition. However, current machine learning models infer phase separation propensity solely from amino acid sequences, failing to capture these context-dependent behaviors. Here we show that LLPSense, a machine learning framework that integrates protein language model embeddings with environmental parameters, achieves accurate, condition-aware predictions of phase separation. Multiple experimental validations confirm LLPSense's predictive power and utility. The model reveals complex, temperature-dependent reentrant behavior in SGTA, previously unrecognized as phase-separating. Moreover, LLPSense accurately predicts mutations in Parkinson's disease-associated α-synuclein that either enhance or suppress phase separation. Beyond predictive accuracy, model-guided mutagenesis enables the modulation of phase behavior. Collectively, LLPSense establishes a robust computational framework for interrogating phase landscapes, facilitating mechanistic disease studies and programmable condensate design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.