Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42669659›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Exploring community awareness and perspectives on zoonotic disease in Nepal: a qualitative study.

Anna Durrance-Bagale, Hari Basnet, Nanda Bahadur Singh, Steven R Belmain, James W Rudge, Natasha Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna Durrance-BagaleDepartment of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. anna.durrance-bagale@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-1862
Hari BasnetNepalese Ornithological Union, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nanda Bahadur SinghCentral Department of Zoology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Steven R BelmainNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK. S.R.Belmain@greenwich.ac.uk.
James W RudgeDepartment of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Natasha HowardDepartment of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQualitative research focused on Nepalese community perspectives on zoonotic disease is lacking. We aimed to characterise the contextual factors and mechanisms driving awareness of risk and prevention of zoonotic diseases in selected communities in Nepal.

methodsWe conducted 39 semi-structured individual interviews in six communities, and five focus groups with 34 participants. Ten participated in photovoice. Twenty healthcare professionals and policymakers were interviewed, 14 representing human health and six representing animal health. We analysed data thematically.

findingsWe generated two major themes: disease awareness, and beliefs and behaviours. Participants were aware of diseases that they had directly experienced or that they perceived might affect their family or livelihood. This was especially true of rabies. Information on disease was usually spread informally. Use of traditional medicine was widespread: some participants saw this behaviour as anachronistic, with others seeing it as pragmatic, as accessing traditional healers is often easier than visiting health posts. Consuming bushmeat was seen as something 'others' did, although some suggested bushmeat was medicinal and others distinguished between 'clean' and 'dirty' rodents. Hygiene practices were perceived as necessary to remove dirt but seldom linked explicitly to illness. Religious beliefs were presented as a reason for not harming rodents.

conclusionWorking with communities is essential to understanding complex behaviours that might increase disease risk, especially in communities that lack resources to mitigate these threats. Specific implications for policymakers are the importance of ensuring the healthcare system is inclusive of different groups needing its services, and that differing beliefs are considered when designing services.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeZoonosesAdultAnimalsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNepalQualitative ResearchAwarenessCommunityInfectious diseaseNepalRisk factorsZoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID42669659
PMCPMC13528166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.