ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026
Biofilm Source Shapes the Tolerance to Short-Term Ciprofloxacin Exposure.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biofilm Source Shapes the Tolerance to Short-Term Ciprofloxacin Exposure.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Periphytic biofilms are key mediators of freshwater ecosystem processes but are increasingly exposed to anthropogenic stressors. We compared biofilms sampled upstream and downstream of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent, two source communities presumed to differ in prior exposure to wastewater-associated press disturbance, to examine differences in tolerance to ciprofloxacin (CIP) exposure. We assessed biomass, photosynthetic pigments and fatty acid (FA) profiles as well as microbial community structure using qPCR and metabarcoding. Downstream-sourced biofilms exhibited higher biomass stability, reduced pigment and FA losses and fewer bacterial and eukaryotic community shifts under CIP exposure than upstream-sourced biofilms. Upstream-sourced communities, despite higher baseline pigment and FA contents, showed pronounced sensitivity to CIP, including biomass declines and reduced prokaryotic diversity. Taxon-specific responses revealed stress-tolerant Chlorophyceae, cyanobacteria and heterotrophic taxa, which may have contributed to higher functional stability under the tested conditions. Our findings show that biofilm responses to CIP varied with source site and community composition. While not a direct test of environmental filtering, the observed patterns are consistent with its predictions. The results further suggest that legacy effects and spatial heterogeneity may influence biofilm vulnerability to antibiotic exposure, although this requires validation across multiple WWTP-impacted and reference sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.