Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42669363›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2026

Sink or swim: Making sense of the NICE intravenous fluid guidelines as a Foundation Year Doctor.

Talia Patel, Calum R A Heslop, Milap Rajpara, Shivaali Karelia, Rakesh Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Talia PatelUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: talia.patel1@nottingham.ac.uk.
Calum R A HeslopLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Milap RajparaUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Shivaali KareliaRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Rakesh PatelSt Mary's University London, Barts Health NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foundation Year (FY) doctors consistently report feeling underprepared when applying intravenous fluid (IVF) guidelines due to inadequate training, resources and an underemphasis of evidence-based bedside assessment techniques. Given IVFs are the most commonly prescribed substance in the NHS, especially by FY doctors, inappropriate patient assessments and written prescriptions are a patient safety threat. Whilst the NICE IVF guideline exists, it is not without nuance and there remain challenges in delivering effective IVF education and sustainable learning interventions over time. From a FY doctor perspective discussed, senior clinicians demonstrating use of guidelines more explicitly may help address the gap between guidelines and clinical practice. Ultimately, given the widespread use of IVF, there is a need for improved education to develop FY doctors' clinical reasoning and ensure patient safety.

Indexed as

Fluid balanceFoundation Year DoctorGuidelineIntravenous fluidsMedical educationPatient safetyPostgraduateUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID42669363
PMCPMC13581999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.