ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2026
Sub-Acute Re-Elevated Pacing Thresholds After Atrial Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sub-Acute Re-Elevated Pacing Thresholds After Atrial Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe safety and efficacy of the atrial leadless pacemaker (A-LP) with helix fixation have been demonstrated. Usually, elevated acute thresholds decrease gradually and normalize within 24 h. Here, we report a case of subacute re-elevation of pacing thresholds after hospital discharge. CASE PRESENTATION: An 80-year-old female with a history of bradycardia underwent A-LP implantation. At the time of the procedure, the final pacing threshold (PT) was measured at 4.0 V/0.4 ms. On post-procedural Day 1, the PT at 0.4 ms pulse width decreased to 1.0 V. On Day 4, the PT was 1.0 V/0.4 ms prior to the patient's discharge. However, on Day 5, she was readmitted to the hospital due to the loss of atrial capture at the maximum output available after an intravenous administration of 150 mg amiodarone for atrial flutter. Over 3 days of monitoring, atrial PT was higher than 6 V/1.5 ms. A traditional DDD pacemaker was implanted due to recurrent sinus asystole associated with dizziness. At the 1-month follow-up, the PT of atrial A-LP was 0.5 V/0.4 ms. Two months later, an ambulatory Holter confirmed the stable and normal atrial capture of the A-LP after lowering the base rate of the DDD pacemaker. At the 3-month follow-up, PT of the A-LP remained 0.5 V/0.4 ms.
conclusionSub-acute re-elevated PT of the A-LP during the perioperative period may persist for more than 1 week and then normalize within 1 month. If PT re-elevation is suspected to be related to peri-electrode inflammation, a conservative approach with continued monitoring of threshold changes may be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.