ArticleThe ISME journal2026
Conservation agriculture buffers persistent carbon loss under warming by microbial adaptation.
Article in The ISME journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) governs soil carbon persistence under warming, with its magnitude highly dependent on how microbial metabolism adapts to varying substrates. How agricultural management mediates this response in agroecosystems remains poorly understood. To address this, we coupled 18O-H2O tracing of community-level CUE with 13C-probing of substrate utilization efficiency (SUE) from substrates differing in apparent bioavailability after 11 years of experimental warming under conventional and conservation agriculture, using glucose as a readily available carbohydrate and vanillin as a less accessible lignin-derived aromatic substrate. Warming stimulated glucose SUE under both management regimes, whereas vanillin SUE declined by 20% exclusively under conservation agriculture. This shift in relative anabolic efficiency (RAE, SUEglucose/SUEvanillin) was associated with warming-induced changes in CUE, primarily through changes in vanillin rather than glucose SUE. Concurrently, conservation agriculture improved substrate quality under warming, reflected by a reduced litter lignocellulose index. In response, microbial communities exhibited distinct functional adaptations, shifting toward copiotrophic taxa with higher rRNA operon copy numbers and a 16% increase in the anabolic-to-catabolic gene ratio, indicating enhanced microbial growth potential and greater investment for labile-carbon processing. Structural equation modeling further showed that shifts in substrate quality were a primary driver of RAE, mediated by changes in microbial life-history strategies under conservation agriculture. Together, these results provide a genome-resolved mechanistic framework showing that conservation agriculture enhances soil carbon persistence under warming by reshaping microbial relative anabolic efficiency and metabolic strategies, highlighting metabolic adaptation as a key mechanism regulating soil carbon stability in warming agroecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.