ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: are four proximal screws adequate? A clinical and radiological analysis of 105 consecutive cases.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProximal humerus fractures are common injuries, and achieving stable fixation is essential to prevent complications such as varus collapse and screw perforation. While optimal screw positioning has been emphasized biomechanically, clinical evidence regarding the required number of screws in the humeral head, particularly when minimally invasive aiming devices limit placement to four screws, remains limited. This study evaluated whether fixation with four cranial screws provides adequate clinical and radiological stability. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted including 105 patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with plate osteosynthesis. Patients were grouped according to the number of proximal screws used: four screws (n = 58) or more than four screws (n = 47). The primary outcome was the Constant-Murley Score. Secondary outcomes included secondary screw perforation, head-shaft angle maintenance, restoration of medial cortical support, and avascular necrosis. Mean follow-up was 18 ± 6 months.
resultsFunctional outcomes were comparable between groups, with Constant-Murley Scores of 78 ± 7 in the four-screw group and 73 ± 13 in the multi-screw group (p = 0.23). Rates of screw perforation (8.6% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.72) and postoperative head-shaft angles were likewise similar, and no significant alignment change occurred during follow-up. Medial cortical support was restored more frequently in the multi-screw group (82% vs. 63%; p = 0.001), but this did not translate into superior clinical or radiographic outcomes. Avascular necrosis occurred in 3 and 13% of patients, respectively.
conclusionWhen fracture reduction/alignment is adequately restored, the use of four cranial screws appears sufficient to maintain alignment and prevent mechanical complications in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.