Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42669038›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Nursing Empowerment Scale (NES).

Fatma Cerit Soydan, Ayşe Nefise Bahçecik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatma Cerit SoydanHealth Sciences Faculty, Department of Nursing, Istanbul Topkapı University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-5534
Ayşe Nefise BahçecikHealth Sciences Faculty, Department of Nursing, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Istanbul, Turkey, iszu.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5290-1017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpowerment in nurses is a multidimensional construct that has favorable results for both the patient and the employee and is emphasized in order to provide high-quality healthcare. For this concept to be translated into practice, measurement tools developed in this field are of critical importance. Although several validated instruments assess structural, psychological, or behavioral empowerment separately, each having been validated independently, using distinct samples, scoring frameworks, and item structures, no instrument evaluating all three dimensions simultaneously within a single scale has been identified. This gap limits nurse managers in comprehensively diagnosing empowerment and in evaluating the effectiveness of empowerment interventions.

objectiveThe study was conducted to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool aiming to determine the empowerment levels of nurses in a multidimensional manner in terms of structural, psychological, and behavioral dimensions.

methodsIn this methodological study, the standard scale development and validation procedures required for instruments to be psychometrically sound were employed. An initial 256-item pool was generated based on a comprehensive literature review and an autoethnographic approach involving 36 nurses. Subsequently, face and content validity (Lawshe's technique) were evaluated. Data were collected between May and September 2017 from nurses (N = 1992) working across 10 hospitals affiliated with a regional health group in Istanbul; the study was completed with a final sample of 743 nurses (37.3%). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to determine the construct validity of the scale. Cronbach's alpha, item analyses, and test-retest analyses were employed to assess reliability.

resultsThe draft nursing empowerment scale (NES), developed as a result of the face and content validity studies, consisted of 136 items and was administered to the sample group. The EFA conducted resulted in a NES consisting of 103 items and three factors (structural, psychological, and behavioral), explaining 49.95% of the total variance (KMO = 0.97; Bartlett χ

conclusionsThe NES demonstrates good psychometric properties as a comprehensive, multidimensional research instrument. Future research should test the scale on independent and diverse samples. Its considerable length (103 items) is acknowledged as a practical limitation, and the development of a shorter, practice-oriented form is planned. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The NES enables the simultaneous, multidimensional measurement of structural, psychological, and behavioral empowerment within a single instrument. It could be useful in determining empowerment levels and evaluating the effectiveness of targeted empowerment strategies.

Indexed as

EmpowermentNursesPower, PsychologicalPsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyempowermentnursingreliability and validityscale development

Identifiers

PMID42669038
PMCPMC13526285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.