ArticleCureus2026
Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to the Hall Technique Among Pediatric Dentists in Jordan.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe Hall technique (HT) manages dental caries in primary molars by sealing the lesion with a preformed metal crown, a minimally invasive strategy aimed at arresting the disease process. Although convincing evidence of efficacy is available, global acceptance varies. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of Jordanian pediatric dentists regarding the HT and its main features.
methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out using an online questionnaire distributed to Jordanian pediatric dentists from November 1 to 30, 2025. The questionnaire surveyed demographics, knowledge (rationale, indications), attitudes (efficiency, evidence-based), and practices (current use, challenges, concerns). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and binomial logistic regression were used to identify predictors of HT implementation among 120 participants.
resultsMost respondents were female (103/120, 85.8%) and board-certified (91/120, 75.8%). The rationale for caries arrest by sealing with the HT was understood by 118/120 (98.3%) of the respondents. The frequency of HT use was 104/120 (86.7%). Years of clinical practice were significantly associated with the perception that HT is best for uncooperative patients (p = 0.031), and belief in medical contraindications was associated with reduced HT use (p = 0.024). The main concerns were occlusion (65/120, 54.2%), sealing over caries (54/120, 45.0%), and parental acceptance (54/120, 45.0%). The majority perceived HT as a time-saving method (111/120, 92.5%), and the attitudes were generally positive. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the belief in time-saving (OR = 8.58, 95% CI: 2.09-35.21, p = 0.003) and evidence base (OR = 5.21, 95% CI: 1.37-19.81, p = 0.015) were significant positive predictors for HT use, whereas the concern of parental acceptance (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.09-0.65, p = 0.005) and sealing over caries (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.89, p = 0.027) were significant negative predictors. The model explained 28.4-45.2% of the variance in HT use and was a good fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.342).
conclusionPediatric dentists in Jordan had a high level of knowledge of and use of the HT, with adoption rates higher than in many other countries. A positive perception of time efficiency and evidence-based belief strongly favor clinical use, while concerns about parental acceptance and sealing over caries are the main barriers to consistent implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.