ArticleJournal of educational and behavioral statistics : a quarterly publication sponsored by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association2026
Valid Standard Errors for Bayesian Quantile Regression With Clustered and Independent Data.
Article in Journal of educational and behavioral statistics : a quarterly publication sponsored by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bayesian quantile regression typically uses the asymmetric Laplace distribution as working likelihood, not because it is a plausible data-generating distribution but because the corresponding maximum likelihood estimator is identical to the classical estimator by Koenker and Bassett. While point estimation is consistent, credible intervals tend to have poor frequentist coverage. We propose using infinitesimal jackknife (IJ) standard errors introduced by Giordano and Broderick, which do not require resampling and can be obtained from a single Markov chain Monte Carlo run. Simulations and applications to real data show that IJ standard errors have good frequentist properties for both independent and clustered data. We provide an R package, IJSE, that computes IJ standard errors after estimation of any model with the brms wrapper for Stan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.