Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668985›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Deep learning-based in-hospital mortality prediction using long-term sequential data in ICU patients: a multi-center validation study.

Zihao Yan, Xueyu Wang, Xinran Xu, Yu Guo, Wei Chang, Jieyu He

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zihao Yan *School of Public Health, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xueyu Wang *School of Public Health, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xinran XuSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yu GuoSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Wei ChangSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Jieyu HeSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients are at high risk of acute clinical deterioration and in-hospital mortality. Accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality is essential for optimizing clinical decision-making and resource allocation. However, most existing models rely primarily on short-term physiological data from a single hospitalization and lack adequate external validation. This study develops a deep learning-based model that integrates long-term temporal clinical sequences derived from patients' historical ICU records with diagnostic information from the current ICU admission to predict in-hospital all-cause mortality during the current hospitalization. The proposed framework is applicable to both patients with a single ICU admission and those with multiple ICU admissions. Methods: We used current and historical International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, temporal features, and basic demographics to construct the prediction models. Single-admission patients were represented as one-event sequences, while repeated-admission patients were represented as longitudinal diagnostic trajectories. Model training and internal validation were conducted based on the MIMIC-IV database, while the eICU and MIMIC-III databases were used for external independent testing. Five deep learning (DL) models, including Informer and Transformer, were constructed for comparative analysis. On this basis, a stacked model integrating these five base models was further developed. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC), calibration curves, and clinical epidemiological analyses involving meta-analyses across different datasets were used to comprehensively evaluate the model's predictive performance, generalizability, and specific clinical application value. Results: A total of 22,176 patients from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV), MIMIC-III, and eICU were included, and five deep learning models as well as one stacked ensemble model were constructed. In the internal validation set, the AUROC of most deep learning models exceeded 0.89, with the exception of the RNN. Among them, the Informer model achieved the best internal performance, with an AUROC of 0.95 (95% CI [0.928-0.967]). In the dual external validation across different databases, model performance exhibited apparent heterogeneity across cohorts. Although no single model consistently outperformed others, the stacked ensemble model showed relatively competitive overall predictive accuracy and stable generalizability. Conclusions: Compared with traditional models based on short-term biochemical indicators, the proposed deep learning models and the stacked ensemble model demonstrated competitive predictive performance for in-hospital mortality. This study demonstrates the potential of deep learning for ICU mortality prediction and proposes a novel framework for integrating longitudinal diagnostic trajectories into predictive modeling.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsDeep learningLong-term survivalStacked modelTime-series information

Identifiers

PMID42668985
PMCPMC13525758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.