ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Narrative Medicine in Pediatric anti‑NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: A Mixed‑methods Evaluation of Triadic Outcomes Among Children, Parents, and Healthcare Providers.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis can cause severe disability and profound caregiver distress. Narrative medicine has been proposed as a humanistic intervention, but its impact across the complete caregiving triad of children, parents, and healthcare providers has not been systematically evaluated. This exploratory study aimed to assess the multidimensional impact of narrative medicine interventions in this setting. Methods: This retrospective mixed-methods study included five children with severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis (admission mRS ≥4), their mothers, two physicians, and six nurses. Narrative medicine interventions included daily bedside narrative attention, parallel chart writing, family conferences, nurse-led narrative communication, and weekly sharing sessions. Quantitative outcomes included child mRS, parental anxiety (SAS), depression (SDS), caregiver burden (ZBI), and provider empathy (IRI), burnout (NBS), and meaningful work (WAMI). Qualitative data from parallel charts, reflective writings, and family interviews were analyzed thematically. Results: All five children showed favourable neurological improvement (median mRS: 5→1 at 6 months; p=0.039); three returned to school. Parental outcomes showed substantial improvements: SAS (42.8→23.4, p<0.001, d=9.7), SDS (54.8→27.4, p<0.001, d=6.5), and ZBI (59.6→29.6, p<0.001, d=3.4). Nurses (n=6) showed increased empathy (IRI: 63.7→78.0, p=0.003, d=1.9) and reduced burnout (NBS: 73.0→56.3, p=0.002, d=2.1); physicians showed parallel improvements. Thematic analysis identified three potential mechanisms: clinical narrative signals, a window of narrative intervention (weeks 2-4), and bidirectional healing. Conclusion: In this small, exploratory retrospective case series, narrative medicine interventions were temporally associated with favourable trends in neurological outcomes, parental psychological states, and provider well-being. The proposed concepts of clinical narrative signals, a window of narrative intervention, and bidirectional healing offer a preliminary framework for integrating narrative practices into pediatric neurocritical care. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective investigation in larger controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.