Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668949›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology research and practice2026

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Management and Cerebral Protection During Awake Craniotomy: Evidence-Based Approaches.

Marc Knezevic Maragh, Alanna Pagan Garcia, Yuliia Oliinyk, Jayottri Acharjee, Alex Emmanuel Binoy, Feaven Tewfik, Khalil Garada, Loveleen Johal, Nafrin Kormath, Abdulaziz Alkhalidi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marc Knezevic MaraghDepartment of Medicine, Ross University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, Barbados, duhs.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9291-7812
Alanna Pagan GarciaDepartment of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico, uag.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6020-2835
Yuliia OliinykDepartment of Medicine, Odesa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine, duhs.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3389-1467
Jayottri AcharjeeDepartment of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy, univpm.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1267-9152
Alex Emmanuel BinoyDepartment of Medicine, Hywel Dda University Health Board, Aberystwyth, UK, duhs.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4159-4692
Feaven TewfikDepartment of Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, Grenada, sgu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4016-0113
Khalil GaradaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, unideb.hu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1916-9509
Loveleen JohalDepartment of Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, Grenada, sgu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6207-2225
Nafrin KormathDepartment of Medicine, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, India, duhs.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4631-8107
Abdulaziz AlkhalidiDepartment of Medicine, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland, duhs.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5207-9987
Nusaiba AliDepartment of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK, le.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0591-7567
Khalé ReyesDepartment of Medicine, Ross University Medical School, Bridgetown, Barbados, duhs.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2875-2523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Awake craniotomy is a standard neurosurgical technique that enables real-time assessment of brain functions during tumor resection, with high success rates. Although highly effective, the procedure is associated with hemodynamic disturbances, including blood pressure variability and impaired cerebral perfusion, compromising intraoperative safety. A focused literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar was performed to identify relevant studies on intraoperative hemodynamic management during awake craniotomy. Findings were synthesized narratively to summarize current evidence, highlight emerging strategies, and identify knowledge gaps. Hypertension (8%-34%) was the most common disturbance, often triggered by painful surgical stimuli or emergence from sedation, with repeat craniotomy, impaired autoregulation, and glioma pathology as additional risk factors. Hypotension (10%-11%) was linked to perioperative stroke and mortality. Cerebral hypoperfusion contributed to poor outcomes, with stroke up to 23% and neurological morbidity in 68% of patients. Preventive strategies, such as scalp blocks, individualized blood pressure targets, and the use of dexmedetomidine and midazolam, improved intraoperative stability, while short-acting agents, including esmolol and labetalol, were preferred for rapid control. Advanced monitoring modalities, including arterial lines, near-infrared spectroscopy, and cerebral autoregulation indices, enhance safety and support accurate functional mapping. Hemodynamic instability during awake craniotomy influences outcomes. Current evidence supports multimodal prevention, tailored blood pressure control, and short-acting pharmacological agents; practice variation and the lack of randomized trials limit standardization. Looking ahead, advanced monitoring and emerging AI systems may provide new opportunities to enhance cerebral protection and optimize patient safety. This review summarizes evidence on intraoperative hemodynamic control in awake craniotomy, emphasizing strategies that enable maximal safe resection while preserving neurological function.

Indexed as

awake craniotomycerebral protectionhemodynamicintraoperative

Identifiers

PMID42668949
PMCPMC13525630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.