ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Diagnostic value of platelet-lymphocyte ratio for pediatric sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Early diagnosis of pediatric sepsis remains challenging due to limitations of conventional biomarkers. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), derived from routine blood tests, has emerged as a potential diagnostic marker. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PLR for pediatric sepsis. Methodology: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted from inception to March 15, 2026. Studies assessing the diagnostic performance of PLR in pediatric sepsis and reporting sufficient data to construct 2×2 contingency tables were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analysis and Deeks' funnel plot were performed. Results: Fifteen studies with 1,980 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PLR for diagnosing pediatric sepsis were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60-0.82), respectively. The SROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.79, indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy. Significant heterogeneity was observed. Subgroup analysis showed better performance in larger studies (≥150 patients) and studies using higher PLR cut-offs (>50). Deeks' funnel plot showed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.536). Conclusions: Evidence from studies with high-risk of bias indicates that PLR may have moderate diagnostic accuracy for pediatric sepsis and may serve as a simple, cost-effective adjunctive biomarker. Since, most studies were on neonatal population, evidence may not be generalized to older pediatric populations. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to establish standardized cut-off values and validate its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.