Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668942›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026

Scar tenderness as a sensitive marker for uterine scar dehiscence or uterine rupture.

Maria, Erum Majid, Tanzila Fahim, Bader Faiyaz Zuberi, Saima Mujtaba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

MariaMaria, Ward 9B, Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.
Erum MajidErum Majid, Ward 9B, Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.
Tanzila FahimTanzila Fahim, Ward 9B, Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.
Bader Faiyaz ZuberiBader Faiyaz Zuberi, OMI Hospital, Depot Lines, M A Jinnah Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saima MujtabaSaima Mujtaba, Ward 9B, Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of caesarean scar tenderness in predicting uterine dehiscence or rupture during per-operative findings. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, JPMC, Karachi, from November 2021 to July 2024. Women with singleton pregnancies having previous caesarean were given Trial of Labor After Caesarean (TOLAC) after informed consent using consecutive sampling. Exclusion criteria included uterine abnormalities, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, multiple pregnancies, and pre-eclampsia. Data were collected on demographic details, clinical findings, and operative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 27. Results: A total of 385 women were included in the study. Scar tenderness was present in 67.8% of women. Uterine rupture was found in 22.3% of cases, while scar dehiscence was present in 49.9%. The sensitivity of scar tenderness in predicting uterine rupture and dehiscence was 85.6%, and the specificity was 78.5%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.2%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 67.7%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 83.6%. Conclusions: Scar tenderness is a useful clinical predictor of uterine scar complications during TOLAC, particularly in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

Caesarean SectionScar dehiscenceScar TendernessUterine Rupture

Identifiers

PMID42668942
PMCPMC13525533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.