ReviewCureus2026
Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal Morphine in Surgical Patients: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well established that intrathecal morphine (ITM) provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduces systemic opioid requirements across a wide range of surgical procedures. Although extensive evidence supports the efficacy and safety of ITM, concern for delayed respiratory depression persists. Additionally, there is no standard approach for ITM dosing or postprocedural monitoring practices across institutions or medical societies, leading to wide variability that further contributes to inconsistent adoption. In this narrative review, we synthesize contemporary evidence on the pharmacology, analgesic efficacy, and risk profile of ITM and evaluate how current evidence aligns with existing postprocedural monitoring recommendations. A structured literature review identified clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines published within the past 20 years that evaluated perioperative ITM use. Across surgical populations, ITM is associated with reductions in postoperative pain scores and systemic opioid consumption at contemporary doses. At these doses, the incidence of respiratory depression was low and comparable to that observed with intravenous opioids. Reported respiratory events were strongly associated with patient-specific risk factors. Overall, current evidence supports the use of ITM as an effective analgesic modality with an acceptable safety profile. These findings support a risk-stratified approach to postprocedural monitoring that accounts for patient comorbidities and the ITM dose administered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.