Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668935›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026

Prognostic value of a non-contrast CT-based radiomics model in patients with Type-B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Jiajun Zou, Xinyi Shi, Jianqi Ni, Qin Jin, Haofeng Ding, Yifeng Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiajun ZouJiajun Zou Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province 314000, P.R. China.
Xinyi ShiXinyi Shi Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province 314000, P.R. China.
Jianqi NiJianqi Ni Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province 314000, P.R. China.
Qin JinQin Jin Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province 314000, P.R. China.
Haofeng DingHaofeng Ding, Department of Basic Medical, Chengnan Community Healh Service center, Affiliated to Jiaxing Medical University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province 314000, P.R. China.
Yifeng ShenYifeng Shen Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province 314000, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the value of a non-contrast computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics model in predicting adverse prognosis in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methodology: A retrospective analysis included data from 107 patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR at the First Hospital of Jiaxing from January 2010 to May 2024. Patients were randomly divided into a training (n=86) and a validation cohort (n=21) at an 8:2 ratio. Radiomic features were extracted from non-contrast CT images to build a radiomic model. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent clinical risk factors for constructing a clinical model. Lasso regression was used for data dimensionality reduction and model building. A clinical-radiomic model was established by integrating clinical risk factors with radiomic features. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility of the three models were evaluated using ROC curves (specificity and sensitivity), calibration curves, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. Results: Ten radiomic features were selected in the training cohort. Clinical, radiomic, and clinical-radiomic models were generated using eight machine learning algorithms and exhibited good predictive performance. The clinical-radiomic model had the highest AUC values (0.943 in the training cohort, 0.875 in the validation cohort) compared to the clinical and radiomic models. Calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed good calibration of all three models in both sets. DCA revealed that the nomogram model provided favorable clinical net benefits within a certain threshold range. Conclusions: A non-contrast CT-based radiomics machine learning model has high value for predicting adverse prognosis after TEVAR.

Indexed as

B-Type-Aortic dissectionComputer tomography imagingNomogramPoor prognosisRadiomicsThoracic endovascular aortic repair

Identifiers

PMID42668935
PMCPMC13525529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.