Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668822›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026

Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD Patients Treated with Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers and Spacers: Implications for Inhaler Selection. A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Lara Bravo Quiroga, Jose Miguel González-Moro Rodríguez, Francisco Javier Álvarez-Gutiérrez, Krasimira Baynova, Mariam de la Poza Abad, Jose Luis Izquierdo-Alonso

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lara Bravo QuirogaDepartment of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Miguel González-Moro RodríguezDepartment of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8446-3373
Francisco Javier Álvarez-GutiérrezDepartment of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0175-2824
Krasimira BaynovaDepartment of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Mariam de la Poza AbadCentro de Salud Doctor Carles Ribas, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Luis Izquierdo-AlonsoDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-2243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spacer devices are frequently prescribed with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) in patients with COPD for a variety of clinical and practical reasons, including concerns about inspiratory capacity, inhaler technique, and hand-breath coordination. However, inspiratory flow is rarely measured objectively. Purpose: To determine whether COPD patients treated with pMDIs and spacers can generate adequate peak inspiratory flow (PIF) for dry powder inhaler (DPI) use, to evaluate the impact of incomplete exhalation, and to examine patient perceptions of spacer use. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional study included 273 clinically stable COPD patients treated with pMDIs and spacers across 70 Spanish centers. PIF was measured with the In-Check Dial at medium-low (R2) and medium-high (R4) resistance under both standard and suboptimal conditions. Patient knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived barriers were evaluated using structured study questionnaires. Results: Overall, 96.0% of patients achieved a PIF ≥30 L/min at R4, whereas 61.9% reached ≥60 L/min. Incomplete exhalation had only a limited effect on inspiratory performance, with 94.1% of patients maintaining a PIF ≥30 L/min at R4. Lower PIF was associated with greater dyspnea and more severe airflow limitation in bivariate analyses. Spacer prescription was seldom based on objective PIF assessment. Most patients reported practical limitations associated with spacer use and expressed a preference for simpler inhaler devices. Conclusion: Most COPD patients treated with pMDIs and spacers appear to have sufficient inspiratory capacity to use medium- to high-resistance DPIs. Routine objective assessment of PIF may help optimize individualized inhaler selection and identify patients who could benefit from alternative inhaler devices.

Indexed as

Bronchodilator AgentsDry Powder InhalersInhalation SpacersInspiratory CapacityLungMetered Dose InhalersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedBronchodilator AgentsCOPDdry powder inhalerspatient satisfactionpeak inspiratory flowpMDI+spacer

Identifiers

PMID42668822
PMCPMC13525770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.