Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD Patients Treated with Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers and Spacers: Implications for Inhaler Selection. A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spacer devices are frequently prescribed with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) in patients with COPD for a variety of clinical and practical reasons, including concerns about inspiratory capacity, inhaler technique, and hand-breath coordination. However, inspiratory flow is rarely measured objectively. Purpose: To determine whether COPD patients treated with pMDIs and spacers can generate adequate peak inspiratory flow (PIF) for dry powder inhaler (DPI) use, to evaluate the impact of incomplete exhalation, and to examine patient perceptions of spacer use. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional study included 273 clinically stable COPD patients treated with pMDIs and spacers across 70 Spanish centers. PIF was measured with the In-Check Dial at medium-low (R2) and medium-high (R4) resistance under both standard and suboptimal conditions. Patient knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived barriers were evaluated using structured study questionnaires. Results: Overall, 96.0% of patients achieved a PIF ≥30 L/min at R4, whereas 61.9% reached ≥60 L/min. Incomplete exhalation had only a limited effect on inspiratory performance, with 94.1% of patients maintaining a PIF ≥30 L/min at R4. Lower PIF was associated with greater dyspnea and more severe airflow limitation in bivariate analyses. Spacer prescription was seldom based on objective PIF assessment. Most patients reported practical limitations associated with spacer use and expressed a preference for simpler inhaler devices. Conclusion: Most COPD patients treated with pMDIs and spacers appear to have sufficient inspiratory capacity to use medium- to high-resistance DPIs. Routine objective assessment of PIF may help optimize individualized inhaler selection and identify patients who could benefit from alternative inhaler devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.