Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668769›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2026

Factors Associated with Subjective Well-being of Older Employees in the Academe: A Cross-sectional Study.

Andrea D Gestiada, Mary Ann J Ladia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea D GestiadaCollege of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Mary Ann J LadiaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Considering the vital roles of the aging workforce in the Philippine development as well as the unavailability of health data, there is a need to address gaps in the current state of employment and their quality of life, which may likewise improve their performance. This study aimed to assess the relationship of individual and workplace factors with the subjective well-being (SWB) of older employees in the academe in line with the University of the Philippines Wellness Initiatives for Seniors and Elders (UPWISE) Program. Methods: The 69 randomly selected respondents were employees ages 50 years and above as of June 30, 2020, representing the faculty, administrative staff, including the research extension and professional staff (REPS) of the leading university in the Philippines. SWB was measured through the WHO-5, and its association with the identified individual and workplace factors was tested through Fisher's exact test. The resulting Results: Almost ninety percent of the respondents had better SWB. When tested at a five percent level of significance, the SWB had no significant associations with 1) individual factors: perceived health condition ( Conclusion: With the lack of statistically significant associations, further research should be done with regard to other aspects of individuals and workplaces. This includes the relationship between individuals and their caregivers, including the support provided, the presence of existing health programs, personal growth efforts, working hours, and salaries. Qualitative studies may provide an in-depth understanding of the cultural factors associated with SWB in a developing country such as the Philippines.

Indexed as

aginghappinesslife satisfactionPhilippinesworkplace

Identifiers

PMID42668769
PMCPMC13525168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.